- Volume 15 Number 4 (2024)
- Volume 15 Number 3 (2024)
- Volume 15 Number 2 (2024)
- Volume 15 Number 1 (2024)
- Volume 14 Number 4 (Nov. 2023)
- Volume 14 Number 3 (Aug. 2023)
- Volume 14 Number 2 (May 2023)
- Volume 14 Number 1 (Feb. 2023)
- Volume 13 Number 4 (Nov. 2022)
- Volume 13 Number 3 (Aug. 2022)
- Volume 13 Number 2 (May 2022)
- Volume 13 Number 1 (Feb. 2022)
- Volume 12 Number 4 (Nov. 2021)
- Volume 12 Number 3 (Aug. 2021)
- Volume 12 Number 2 (May. 2021)
- Volume 12 Number 1 (Feb. 2021)
- Volume 11 Number 6 (Dec. 2020)
- Volume 11 Number 5 (Oct. 2020)
- Volume 11 Number 4 (Aug. 2020)
- Volume 11 Number 3 (Jun. 2020)
- Volume 11 Number 2 (Apr. 2020)
- Volume 11 Number 1 (Feb. 2020)
- Volume 10 Number 6 (Dec. 2019)
- Volume 10 Number 5 (Oct. 2019)
- Volume 10 Number 4 (Aug. 2019)
- Volume 10 Number 3 (Jun. 2019)
- Volume 10 Number 2 (Apr. 2019)
- Volume 10 Number 1 (Feb. 2019)
- Volume 9 Number 6 (Dec. 2018)
- Volume 9 Number 5 (Oct. 2018)
- Volume 9 Number 4 (Aug. 2018)
- Volume 9 Number 3 (Jun. 2018)
- Volume 9 Number 2 (Apr. 2018)
- Volume 9 Number 1 (Feb. 2018)
- Volume 8 Number 6 (Dec. 2017)
- Volume 8 Number 5 (Oct. 2017)
- Volume 8 Number 4 (Aug. 2017)
- Volume 8 Number 3 (Jun. 2017)
- Volume 8 Number 2 (Apr. 2017)
- Volume 8 Number 1 (Feb. 2017)
- Volume 7 Number 6 (Dec. 2016)
- Volume 7 Number 5 (Oct. 2016)
- Volume 7 Number 4 (Aug. 2016)
- Volume 7 Number 3 (Jun. 2016)
- Volume 7 Number 2 (Apr. 2016)
- Volume 7 Number 1 (Feb. 2016)
- Volume 6 Number 6 (Dec. 2015)
- Volume 6 Number 5 (Oct. 2015)
- Volume 6 Number 4 (Aug. 2015)
- Volume 6 Number 3 (Jun. 2015)
- Volume 6 Number 2 (Apr. 2015)
- Volume 6 Number 1 (Feb. 2015)
- Volume 5 Number 6 (Dec. 2014)
- Volume 5 Number 5 (Oct. 2014)
- Volume 5 Number 4 (Aug. 2014)
- Volume 5 Number 3 (Jun. 2014)
- Volume 5 Number 2 (Apr. 2014)
- Volume 5 Number 1 (Feb. 2014)
- Volume 4 Number 6 (Dec. 2013)
- Volume 4 Number 5 (Oct. 2013)
- Volume 4 Number 4 (Aug. 2013)
- Volume 4 Number 3 (Jun. 2013)
- Volume 4 Number 2 (Apr. 2013)
- Volume 4 Number 1 (Feb. 2013)
- Volume 3 Number 6 (Dec. 2012)
- Volume 3 Number 5 (Oct. 2012)
- Volume 3 Number 4 (Aug. 2012)
- Volume 3 Number 3 (Jun. 2012)
- Volume 3 Number 2 (Apr. 2012)
- Volume 3 Number 1 (Feb. 2012)
- Volume 2 Number 6 (Dec. 2011)
- Volume 2 Number 5 (Oct. 2011)
- Volume 2 Number 4 (Aug. 2011)
- Volume 2 Number 3 (Jun. 2011)
- Volume 2 Number 2 (Apr. 2011)
- Volume 2 Number 1 (Feb. 2011)
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
- ISSN: 2010-0248 (Print)
- Abbreviated Title: Int. J. Innov. Manag. Technol.
- Frequency: Quarterly
- DOI: 10.18178/IJIMT
- Editor-in-Chief: Prof. Jin Wang
- Managing Editor: Ms. Nancy Y. Liu
- Abstracting/ Indexing: Google Scholar, CNKI, Ulrich's Periodicals Directory, Crossref, Electronic Journals Library.
E-mail: editor@ijimt.org
- Article Processing Charge: 500 USD
Hierarchical Service Quality Model towards Student Satisfaction
Abstract—Nowadays, achieving good quality experience in higher learning institution is not restricted on teaching and learning aspect. However, several critical factors such as interaction quality, physical environment and outcome quality are substantiated to be explored. Therefore the aim of this paper is to investigate the importance of Hierarchical Service Quality Model (HSQM) and student satisfaction in higher education setting. Hence, data were collected via survey questionnaires to the total 179 respondents in Faculty of Office Management Universiti Teknologi MARA, Puncak Alam, Selangor. All the hypothesized relationships were tested using Pearson correlation coefficient. The results indicated that elements of HSQM are positive and have significant relationship to the student satisfaction. Notably, physical environment of the faculty are the highest element that contributes to student satisfaction. In brief, the university should improve their service quality in order to remain competitive in this globalized environment as well as to increase student satisfaction.
Index Terms—Hierarchical service quality, student satisfaction, interaction quality, physical environment quality and outcome quality.
Aida Azlina Mansor, Rahayu Hasanordin, Muhammad Hafiz Abd Rashid,and Wan Edura Wan Rashid are with the Universiti Teknologi MARA,Malaysia (e-mail: {aidaazlina, rahayu484, hafiz.rashid,wanedura}@puncakalam.uitm.edu.my).
Cite: Aida Azlina Mansor, Rahayu Hasanordin, Muhammad Hafiz Abd Rashid, and Wan Edura Wan Rashid, "Hierarchical Service Quality Model towards Student Satisfaction," International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 803-807, 2012.